SHORTS AND SHORTER. San Geraldo suggested it's a true fashion trend, always worn short on the right. Although today's three examples prove his theory, previous sightings (click here) disprove it.
In the world of men's earrings, it used to be the case that if your left ear was pierced, it indicated you were straight; if your right ear was pierced, you were gay. Both ears pierced meant bi-sexual (or simply of open sexuality).
I had my left ear pierced. Twice. What did I know?!?
Is this a new secret code? Do we need a new secret code? I'm open to your theories.
PANTALONES CORTOS Y más cortos. San Geraldo sugirió que es una verdadera tendencia de moda, siempre se usa más corto a la derecha. Aunque los tres ejemplos de hoy prueban la teoría, los avistamientos previos (haz clic aquí) lo refutan.
En el mundo de los pendientes para hombres, solía ocurrir que si perforaban tu oreja izquierda, indicaba que eras heterosexual; si tu oreja derecha fue perforada, eras homosexual. Ambas orejas perforadas significaban bi-sexual (o simplemente de sexualidad abierta).
Me perforaron la oreja izquierda. Dos veces. ¿¡¿Qué sabía yo?!?
¿Es este un nuevo código secreto? ¿Necesitamos un nuevo código secreto? Estoy abierto a tus teorías.
 |
| NO ACCIDENT. HE MADE SURE TO READJUST THE RIGHT LEG AFTER HIS SHOWER. NO ACCIDENTE. SE PREOCUPÓ POR REAJUSTAR LA PIERNA DERECHA DESPUÉS DE LA DUCHA. |
Those last two are clearly tucked in, oh my! Still beats shorts that hang below the knee. If you have nice legs, why cover them?
ReplyDeleteTravel:
DeleteI agree! The style is either folded, rolled, or tucked into the underwear lining.
Maybe it is just the best-looking leg that gets the shorter short? I have noticed that one side of my body is larger than the other - probably everyone has this - so things ride up on that side more. Though I do like the "secret signals" idea a lot!
ReplyDeletesillygirl:
DeleteOK. I have to start comaring legs. As far as riding up, that would be an entirely different photo collection. Here I've only included the shorts when clearly a decision was made.
It's code for "Hey I'm a fashion slave no matter how stupid I look!". Maybe they have a wedgie fetish but are too scared to fully commit. That being said (somebody had to), that last guy has fantastic legs and he needs to take these off and put on some skimpy symmetrical, not necessarily Speedos, shorts. Nekkid is good too.
ReplyDeleteDeedles:
DeleteI like the wedgie fetish. I agree about the last guy. I think it's fútbol player thighs! Very common around here.
It's members of the Spanish Illuminati
ReplyDeleteAdam:
DeleteWell, I wish they'd illuminate the rest of us!
That particular leg itched, maybe?
ReplyDeleteKirk:
DeleteHeat rash?
Oh Lordy! Will this current 'fashion' never end? Luckily for me I've yet to see this garment in real life and I fully intend to keep it that way.
ReplyDeleteRaybeard:
DeleteYou can do it yourself if you like. It looks like it's pretty easy to figure out.
Why?!
ReplyDeleteKMoff:
DeleteBecause they can?
Ask some one.... it has to be a secret pass word.
ReplyDeletecheers, parsnip and badger
Parsnip:
DeleteThe next time I see someone who appears to be approachable, I'm going to ask... especially when I see someone carefully fold or roll one leg while I'm in sight.
You really must ask a few of the wearers of trend what is up with one leg and why one leg instead of the other. Your readers insist.
ReplyDeleteWilma:
DeleteI went walking intending to do just that. Figures I didn't see one individual with one shorts leg shorter than the other!
Right leg....straight maybe? Just to not confuse anyone?
ReplyDeleteYes, Mitchell, you MUST ask! I DARE you! make something up and go from there. We NEED to know!!
Jim:
DeleteWell, if it follows the earrings "rule," it would be right leg... gay. No need to make something up. I promise before I share another set of these photos, I'm going to ask someone!
You live there, so doing research would be easy. You could interview all the cute guys with one short sided shorts. Be sure to keep records. Please get back to us with a detailed report (and more photos) ASAP.
ReplyDeleteFrank:
DeleteOK. But only because you insist.
@deedles - OH HELL YASSSSSSSSSS, GURL!
ReplyDeletewhatever this is, it's stupid.
anne marie:
DeleteI agree with you and Deedles. As for stupid, I refuse to pass judgment ... until someone tells me the stupid reason!
Ok, I'll ask: how do they get them to stay up? Mine won't.
ReplyDeleteWalt the Fourth:
DeleteWell-structured shorts that you can fold or roll. OR... running shorts/swimming shorts with built-in support; you just tuck it into the underwear... which you could do if you wore nylon shorts with underwear, too. I've give this a lot of thought.
The side to which the man "dresses" -- I bet that's the side with the longer shorts leg for coverage purposes. How's THAT for a theory?
ReplyDeleteDebra:
DeleteWe've discussed that. And, so far, it's the best idea -- which isn't saying much!